After a Manhattan federal judge blasted Roche Freedman LLP founding partner Kyle Roche’s public statements, the judge has removed the crypto boutique law firm from the market manipulation lawsuit against Tether and Bitfinex. The recent hearing has shown that U.S. district judge, Katherine Polk Failla, believes the litigation process could be derailed. She further stressed that “the metaphorical baggage” Roche Freedman carries “is not in the best interests of the class.”

Judge Boots Roche Freedman From Class Action Lawsuit Against Tether and Bitfinex

At the end of August, the Roche Freedman LLP founding partner Kyle Roche found himself amid a lot of controversies, as a series of videos published by Crypto Leaks saw him discussing specific relationships with certain crypto businesses. On August 31, Roche removed himself from a number of crypto-related class action lawsuits and he further addressed the Crypto Leaks videos. He said that the leaked videos contained “numerous unsourced false statements” that were “illegally obtained.” Roche added:

[The] highly edited video clips [are] not presented with accurate context.

However, following the leaks, Tether’s legal representation, Elliot Greenfield of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, asked the court to remove the law firm Roche Freedman from the class-action lawsuit. Tether’s lawyer Elliot Greenfield said that the leaks and Roche’s involvement with the class-action lawsuit raises “grave concerns for the defendants regarding the motivations behind the lawsuit.” Furthermore, the crypto exchange companies Bittrex and Poloniex sent a request to the judge as well, asking her to remove Kyle Roche’s law firm from the court proceedings.

Following the requests from Tether, Poloniex, and Bittrex, law360.com reported that the “Manhattan federal judge blasted Roche Freedman LLP founding partner Kyle Roche’s ‘uniquely stupid’ comments.” Then, both Bloomberg Law and law360.com published reports that indicate U.S. district judge Katherine Polk Failla has removed Roche Freedman from the lawsuit. Failla explained that Roche’s public comments were “too detailed to dismiss out of hand.”

The law firms Selendy Gay Elsberg and Schneider Wallace will take the reins in the class action lawsuit, after Roche Freedman’s official disqualification. Failla said that the law firm could still serve as counsel, but she stressed that “the metaphorical baggage” Roche Freedman carries “is not in the best interests of the class.” Bloomberg Law contributor Justin Wise further adds that “Roche Freedman faces disqualification motions in at least four other cases, according to federal court filings.”

Tags in this story
BitFinex, Bittrex, Bittrex Global, Class Action Lawsuit, Class-Action, confidential information, Crypto, crypto businesses, Crypto Leaks, Crypto Leaks videos, Debevoise & Plimpton, Elliot Greenfield, Judge Katherine Polk Failla, Katherine Polk Failla, Kyle Roche, law firm, Lawsuit, Poloniex, Roche Freedman, Roche Freedman LLP, Tether, Tether (USDT), USDT, videos

What do you think about Roche Freedman being removed from the Tether class action lawsuit? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is the News Lead at Maximumhorrors.com News and a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 6,000 articles for Maximumhorrors.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.




Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Maximumhorrors.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Read disclaimer